You can process it, cut it up, move it around and save different versions, but the original files will always be there.
The most important feature (for me) of object-oriented editing is that your original audio is never touched. Upscale versions add extended sample libraries, more video support, and 4-point (classical) editing. The tool set is very complete, including standard signal processing, spectral editing, drum editing, and pitch correction. Samplitude aspires (and often succeeds) in being an all-in-one audio production environment, meaning you can go from virtual instrument sketches to live tracking, editing, mixing, and mastering all in the same program. Users of Samplitude (and/or its big sister Sequoia) include several major broadcast networks. Consequently, the user base here consists a smaller number of very serious users rather than a large number of casual ones.
#Samplitude pro x2 support midi no sound after loading vsts how to#
They never really figured out how to crack the US market before Pro Tools consumed all the commercial oxygen. The fact that it's more popular in Europe is partly due to the fact that its parent company is based in Germany. The name change to Pro X obscures the fact that this is really Samplitude version 12, so this program has been around a long time. Samplitude is a very mature and quite complete audio production environment. Some feedback on this would be appreciated. So, I was wondering if I should consider it as another option to Cubase 6.5. I also noticed that it is not one of the more popular DAWs in the U.S., maybe more popular in Europe (I wonder why ?), and it has a pretty expensive price tag when compared to other DAWs. is it restricted to a pure-linear method of constructing/editing sections of a song ? and does it offer a Video-Track to be able to score to video ? I also could not find out if 'Samplitude Pro X' has a feature that resembles the 'Arranger Track' in Cubase ? or any other type of 'Pattern-Mode' editing ? so. What makes 'Object Oriented Editing' so special, can someone explain this ? and is it relatively easy to learn/work with ? does it have a fast workflow ? Is it very stable and efficient ?īeing a Cubase 6.5 user, what are most useful features that you think 'Samplitude Pro X' will offer me that Cubase 6.5 does not currently have ? Any user opinions on 'Samplitude Pro X' ? i.e.